New Essay in the Winter Edition of American Affairs by IMI’s Marshall Auerback and Jan Ritch-Frel

The following is an excerpt of an essay that was originally published in the Winter 2020 edition of American Affairs journal.

Click to read the full article online.

American Affairs Essay by Marshall Auerback and Jan Frel: "New Fault Lines in a Post-Globalized World"

New Fault Lines in a Post-Globalized World

By Marshall Auerback and Jan Ritch-Frel

November 20, 2020

The economic damage of the coronavirus pandemic has upended the global economic system and, just as importantly, cast out the neoliberal orthodoxy that dominated the industrialized world for the past forty years. But Covid-19 has only accelerated a process that was already well underway, impacting trade negotiations between China, the United States, and the European Union and spreading throughout the world’s largest economies. Although many defenders of the old order lament this trend, it is as significant a shift as the dawn of the era of global trade that began with the birth of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Economists, politicians, and pundits are often tempted to see new economic patterns through the lens of the past. Thus, we are likely to hear that we are returning to nineteenth-century mercantilism or that we will see a revival of 1970s-style stagflation. But this historical view misunderstands our present moment; the motives now are different, and so are the outcomes.

Instead, what we are experiencing is the realization by governments of developed countries that new technologies enable them to expand or initiate new and profitable production capacity closer to or within their own markets. The savings in transportation, packaging, and security costs that come with domestic production, along with benefits to regional neighbors and to domestic workforces, will increasingly enable developed nations to compete with the price of goods produced through the current internationalized trade system. American politicians from Donald Trump to Elizabeth Warren are increasingly joined by a chorus of European and Asian politicians who see the long-term political benefit of supporting this transition.

Today, the “New World Order” looks old. Offshoring and global supply chains are out; regional and local production is in. Market fundamentalism is passé; regulation is the norm. National security considerations supersede untrammeled foreign investment flows. Public health is now more valuable than just-in-time supply systems. Stockpiling and building industrial capacity suddenly make more sense, which may have future implications for the recently revived antitrust debate in the United States.

Read the rest at American Affairs journal.

Marshall Auerback is a researcher at the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, a fellow of Economists for Peace and Security, and a regular contributor to Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Jan Ritch-Frel is the executive director of the Independent Media Institute.

Voting Booth Now Has Its Own Web Magazine

Announcing VotingBooth.media Website

The Independent Media Institute’s Voting Booth project has a new website that will feature the latest news and trends about how people will vote this fall—and how their votes will be counted and verified.

The website, VotingBooth.media, is reported and edited by Steven Rosenfeld. It will continue to feature in-depth reporting but introduce shorter takes on the latest news and trends, such as:

IMI will continue to produce a selection of Voting Booth articles in-house. Thanks for reading, and please support the work we do—we are here to educate, inspire, and help people make better decisions.

2020 Fall Voter Guide: How to Make Sure Your Vote Counts

Make a plan to vote. Know your options. Ignore partisan noise.

Nobody needs to be told about the stakes in 2020’s fall elections. But what has been missing from coverage of ongoing presidential smears, postal service worries and questions about more congressional aid in a pandemic is information for voters on how to successfully vote.

Never before will so many Americans vote from home using mailed-out ballots. Yet many voters, especially in communities of color, cherish voting in person. They want to see votes cast and received, even if that means waiting for hours in primaries with far fewer polling places.

The Independent Media Institute’s Voting Booth project has studied 2020’s spring and summer primaries and produced a guide for voters to successfully cast a ballot this fall. The “2020 Fall Voter Guide: How to Make Sure Your Vote Counts” is based on the latest trends, lessons learned, the legal and procedural landscape, and what will not be likely to change for voters this fall.

The guide urges voters to have a plan. That plan starts with ensuring that one’s voter registration information and signature are current. The voting guide explains how to do that. The guide also reminds voters that there are three ways to vote—from home via a mailed-out ballot, before Election Day at an in-person early voting site, and on Election Day, November 3, in most states. It discusses the pros and cons of each way to vote, including what voters need to do if something goes wrong.

New ways of voting are always challenging for voters and officials. But even in a pandemic, the surest way to have elections with irrefutable results is when the turnout is historic, the process is orderly and victory margins are wide. Voting Booth’s “2020 Fall Voter Guide: How to Make Sure Your Vote Counts” tells voters how to cast a ballot that will be counted this fall.

Read more at the National Memo, or download the guide.

IMI Globetrotter Fellow Teesta Setalvad Conferred with Honorary Doctorate for Human Rights Work and Crusading Journalism

From Citizens for Justice and Peace:

On Monday, June 22, the University of British Columbia conferred an honorary doctorate on human rights defender and journalist and long-time Independent Media Institute contributor and Globetrotter fellow Teesta Setalvad.

The University of British Columbia said in its statement, “Teesta Setalvad is a civil rights activist, author and award-winning journalist in India who played a prominent role in the campaign for justice for the victims of the 2002 massacre of close to two thousand Muslims in the state of Gujarat. She has worked in the field of human rights and law to expose majoritarianism and religious fanaticism in India and other parts of the world, deepening human rights jurisprudence on victimology and access to justice. She has also been influential on issues concerning rights of women, religious minorities, Indigenous persons, and forest dwelling communities.”

Click to read more from CJP.

The Statues Are Being Taken Down—Including Calhoun

Dear friends, 

As many of you probably already know, in the weeks since the police murder of George Floyd—and Breonna Taylor, and Tony McDade, and Rayshard Brooks—there’s been a renewed call for the removal of monuments that celebrate white supremacy. It’s been absolutely fantastic seeing statues that laud those who both engaged in and represent white terror come down in sites all around this country. The list seems to grow daily, and here’s hoping it continues to expand.

Among the statues taken down or slated for removal that overlap with our 10 Most Unwanted is the Spirit of Confederacy in Houston, Texas; the Tribute to the Women of the Southern Confederacy in Jacksonville, Florida; and the Confederate War Memorial in Dallas, Texas. There are so many activists who worked tirelessly for years to make this happen. Thank you for pushing and for making this happen.

That brings me to the towering figure of John C. Calhoun that has stood in Charleston’s Marion Square since 1887—a monument to white Charlestonians’ hostility to Black civil rights gains. On Wednesday, Mayor John Tecklenburg announced plans to remove the statue. Finally, Charleston will be taking down a tribute to a figure who never deserved to be honored in the first place.

This comes after so much hard work by so many folks in Charleston demanded it. Many of those same folks were kind enough to support our campaign to have Calhoun removed—an effort that began long after the work they’d already put in. I’m so incredibly grateful that they were willing to welcome and work with us—they are an incredible group of folks, and we were so lucky to learn from them.

Thanks to so many Charleston folks: Millicent Brown, Rev. Joseph Darby, Tamika Gadsden, Benjamin Starr, Marjory Wentworth, Elliott Smith, McKenzie Eddy, Cara Leespon, Marcus Amaker, Samira Miché aka DJ Sista Misses, Jeremy Rutledge, Todd Anderson, Bryan Watson Granger, Mark Sloan, Erin Leigh and everyone at Dance Matters, Fletcher Williams III, Nakeisha Daniel, Javaron Conyers, Robert Tokanel, Rev. Charles Heyward, Terry Fox, Buff Ross, Nick Rubin, Bennet J., Hannah Ross, Dot Scott, Susan Dunn, Chan Lebeau, Gracie Cox, Damon L. Fordham, Darron Lee Calhoun, Barry Stiefel, Kelly Rae Smith, Bernard E. Powers, Mari Crabtree and so many other folks.

The Make It Right Project is currently in a state of transition, which is why you’ve heard so little from us lately. We’re recalibrating things on our end, but looking forward to upcoming changes. Stand by.

In the meantime, I wrote a piece about the Calhoun statue and how long Black folks have been fighting to have it removed. You can check it out here.

Thank you,

Kali Holloway
Director of the Make It Right Project

The Murder of George Floyd Is Normal in an Abnormal Society

By Vijay Prashad

There is no need to wonder why George Floyd (age 46) was murdered in broad daylight in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on May 25, 2020. The script of his death is written deep in the ugly drama of U.S. history.

I Can’t Breathe 2020

Officer Derek Chauvin’s knee sat on George Floyd’s neck for eight minutes and 46 seconds. After that time, George Floyd was dead. From the moment Chauvin put his body on an unarmed man, George Floyd said—eleven times—I can’t breathe.

Scientists who study human respiration say that untrained people can hold their breath from between thirty seconds and two minutes; anything more than that results in a process that leads eventually to death.

I Can’t Breathe 2014

Officer Daniel Pantaleo slammed Eric Garner onto the New York City sidewalk just minutes after Garner had helped resolve a dispute on the street. Pantaleo pushed Garner’s face onto the pavement, and Garner said—eleven times—I can’t breathe.

Garner lost consciousness, did not receive medical care in the ambulance, and was pronounced dead soon after arriving at the hospital. He died, effectively, of suffocation.

Dismayed

Both Floyd and Garner were African American; both were men who struggled to make a living in a harsh economic environment.

The UN Human Rights head Michelle Bachelet wrote a powerful statement in response to the death of George Floyd: “This is the latest in a long line of killings of unarmed African Americans by U.S. police officers and members of the public. I am dismayed to have to add George Floyd’s name to that of Breonna Taylor, Eric Garner, Michael Brown and many other unarmed African Americans who have died over the years at the hands of the police—as well as people such as Ahmaud Arbery and Trayvon Martin who were killed by armed members of the public.”

Each year in the United States, more than a thousand people are killed by the police; African Americans are three times more likely to be killed by the police than whites, and African Americans who are killed by police are more likely to be unarmed than whites. Most of these killings are not associated with serious crime. Astoundingly, 99 percent of the officers who kill a civilian are not charged with a crime.

Permanent Depression

“The Depression,” the poet Langston Hughes wrote of the 1930s, “brought everybody down a peg or two.” It was different for African Americans, for they “had but few pegs to fall.”

Garner was accused of selling loose cigarettes on the street, violating excise tax laws to make a few dollars; Floyd was accused of using a counterfeit $20 bill. Even if these accusations could have been proved, neither were earth-shattering crimes; if they had gone to court, neither would have earned these men death sentences. They were killed after being accused of minor infringements.

When Hughes wrote those words, Lino Rivera, a 16-year-old Afro-Puerto Rican boy, had been arrested for shoplifting a 10-cent penknife. A crowd gathered when the police went to arrest him, a rumor spread that he had been killed, and Harlem rose up in anger. A government report later showed that the protests were “spontaneous” and that the causes of the unrest were “the injustices of discrimination in employment, the aggressions of the police, and racial segregation.” This report could have been written last week. It suggests a permanent Depression.

System Cannot Be Reformed

Historically, police aggression has come before any unrest. In 1967, unrest in Detroit spurred the U.S. government to study the causes, which they assumed would be communist instigators and an inflammatory press. The riots, the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (the Kerner Commission) said, “were not caused by, nor were they the consequences of, any organized plan or ‘conspiracy.’”

Instead, the Kerner Commission said that the cause of the unrest was structural racism. “What white Americans have never fully understood,” the report noted, “is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it.” By “ghetto” the report’s authors meant the atrocious class inequalities in the United States that had—because of the history of enslavement—been marked by race.

Rather than address the deep inequalities in society, the American government chose to heavily arm police officers and send them to discipline populations in distress with their dangerous weapons. The commission proposed instead “a policy which combines ghetto enrichment with programs designed to encourage integration… into the society outside the ghetto.”

Nothing came of that report, as nothing has come of any of the reports that stretch backward 150 years. Rather than genuinely invest in the well-being of people, the American government—whether governed by Republicans or Democrats—cut back on social programs and cut back on welfare spending; it allowed firms to erode wages and it allowed them to diminish working conditions. What was terrible in 1968 only became worse for the working-class Black population.

The financial crisis of 2008 stole from African American households’ savings that had been accumulated through generations of work. By 2013, Pew Research found that the net worth of white households was 13 times greater than African American households; this was the largest such gap since 1989, and it is a gap that has only widened. Now, with the global pandemic striking the United States particularly hard, data shows that the disease has struck African Americans and other people of color the most. Some of this is because it is African Americans and other people of color who often have the most dangerous frontline jobs.

If Eric Garner and George Floyd earned a minimum wage of $25 for decent work, would they need to be in a position where a belligerent police officer would accuse them of selling loose cigarettes or of passing a counterfeit bill?

They Are Normal

Society in the United States has been broken by the mechanisms of high rates of economic inequality, high rates of poverty, impossible entry into robust educational systems, and remarkable warlike conditions put in place to manage populations no longer seen as the citizenry but as criminals.

Such processes corrode a civilization. The names of Michael Brown, Sandra Bland, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice… and now George Floyd are only the names of the present moment, written in thick ink on cardboard signs across the United States at the many, many protests that continue to take place. The taste of desperation lingers in these protests, along with the anger at the system, and the outrage seems to have no outlet.

Donald Trump is an exaggeration of the normal course of history in the United States. He takes the ugliness to the utmost limit, bringing in the army, sniffing around for the legal possibility of the mass detention of demonstrators. His is a politics of violence. It does not last long. It is hard to beat the urge for justice out of an entire people.

As you read this, somewhere in the United States, another person will be killed—another poor person whom the police deem to be a threat. Tomorrow another will be killed; and then another. These deaths are normal for the system. Outrage against this system is a logical, and moral, response.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is the chief editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than twenty books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest book is Washington Bullets, with an introduction by Evo Morales Ayma.

This article was produced by Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Coronavirus Shows Humanity That It’s Entirely Possible to Avert Climate Disaster

Tiny terror: Coronavirus CG illustration (Image credit: Yuri Samoilo/Flickr)

The global lockdown has given Mother Nature a breath of fresh air.

By Reynard Loki, Independent Media Institute

Amidst all the terrible news about the spreading coronavirus epidemic, a scintillating fact has emerged that can energize the environmental movement: The global slowdown in human activity has given Mother Nature some time to take a much-needed breath of fresh air. Between travel restrictions, reductions in public transport and overall economic activity that generates emissions—such as coal burning, refining oil and producing steel—the climate is getting the kind of rest from destructive human activity it hasn’t gotten since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.

The lockdown in China (the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases), for example, has cut the nation’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 100 million metric tons in just two weeks, according to an analysis by Carbon Brief, a UK-based climate policy watchdog. That’s down a quarter from the same two-week period in 2019. Observations made by NASA and European Space Agency pollution monitoring satellites appear to confirm the analysis. They show a sudden and steep decrease in nitrogen dioxide (NO2)—an air pollutant emitted by power plants, factories and vehicles—over China during mid-February when the nation entered a quarantine.

“This is the first time I have seen such a dramatic drop-off over such a wide area for a specific event,” said Fei Liu, an air quality researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

Back to nature: The maps above show nitrogen dioxide values across China from January 1-20, 2020 (before the quarantine), and February 10-25 (during the quarantine). (Image credit: European Space Agency via NASA)

While these are significant and sudden reductions and were achieved over a remarkably brief period of time, they are temporary. The long-term effects on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions and other atmospheric pollutants are unclear. On one hand, Chinese authorities may try to boost production after the pandemic is over in an attempt to make up for the lost time. On the other hand, the economic impact of the pandemic may suppress the global demand for Chinese goods for months or even years to come.

“Any sustained impact on fossil-fuel use would come from reduced demand, which initial indicators suggest could have a major impact. For example, February car sales are forecast to fall by 30 percent below last year’s already depressed levels,” writes Lauri Myllyvirta, lead analyst at the Finland-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. “If consumer demand is reduced—for example, due to unpaid wages during the crisis cascading through the rest of the economy—then industrial output and fossil-fuel use might not recover, even though capacity is available to do so.”

Still, the findings offer climate activists a tantalizing fact: It is technically feasible to achieve big reductions in pollutants that are fueling the climate crisis. All that’s required is a break in economic production and human activity. But while a global pandemic can instigate a break in human activity, the climate crisis hasn’t been able to make a dent in it. Why is that?

For one thing, the coronavirus pandemic has a clear killer: a microorganism. And the global death toll is rising by the hour as the virus jumps from person to person. The climate crisis, on the other hand, doesn’t have a distinct killer. There have been countless deaths tied to all the human activity that is the cause of the climate crisis: heat waves, hurricanes, droughts, and yes, even diseases, like Lyme disease, the normal range of which has spread due to warming climates. And, course, there is the invisible killer that’s not a microorganism: air pollution, which is caused by a number of toxic chemicals, some of which are greenhouse gases that are heating up the planet. But the fatalities associated with climate impacts are many steps removed from the actual causes, which are simply a matter of degree: too many cars and trucks on the roads, too many planes in the sky, too many bulldozers clearing rainforests, too many factories, air conditioners, large-screen televisions, mansions. Ultimately, too many people consuming too many things.

Let’s say COVID-19, the disease caused by coronavirus, ends up killing seven million people this year. That figure would probably shock most people. But that is the same number of people who die from air pollution—every single year. As Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, writes, “Black carbon, methane, and nitrogen oxides are powerful drivers of global warming, and, along with other air pollutants such as carbon monoxide and ozone, they are responsible for over seven million deaths each year, about one in eight worldwide.”

And that’s just air pollution. Heat exposure, coastal flooding and diseases like malaria and dengue—all increased by climate change—could cause approximately 250,000 deaths annually between 2030 and 2050, according to the World Health Organization. A study led by Oxford University forecast that by 2050, climate-related reductions in food availability (primarily fruits and vegetables) will cause an additional 529,000 adult deaths worldwide.

Sadly, no one knows these statistics, because—tragically for all the people who might be saved, and for the planet—the mainstream news media barely covers the climate. The figures are shocking. Major network news programs devoted barely four hours to the climate crisis over the entirety of 2019, according to a recent study by Media Matters. That amounts to a paltry 0.7 percent of overall evening broadcasts and the Sunday morning news shows.

Clearly, we cannot rely on the media. And we can’t rely on world leaders, either. According to a recent report by a panel of world-class scientists, “The Truth Behind the Paris Agreement Climate Pledges,” the majority of the carbon emission reduction pledges for 2030 that 184 countries made under the international accord aren’t nearly enough to prevent global warming from exceeding 2° Celsius above pre-industrial levels, which is necessary to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. The authors further note that some nations won’t even meet their pledges, and some of the biggest polluters will even increase their emissions.

It’s up to you and me, and every single individual who wants a healthy planet for ourselves, our children and future generations. And environmental activists should use this moment in history to help people understand that we can, we should and we must make changes to our behavior, our lifestyles, and our consumption habits.

Across the globe, the coronavirus pandemic has changed daily human life in ways small (like the length of time we wash our hands) and big (like how we work and play). It also demonstrates one salient fact: Our everyday activities impact so many things—not just our own personal health, but the health of our local communities and even the entire planet. Coronavirus is a killer, but it can also be a teacher. Let’s learn all of its lessons.

This article was produced by Earth | Food | Life, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Reynard Loki is a senior writing fellow and the editor and chief correspondent for Earth | Food | Life, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He previously served as the environment, food and animal rights editor at AlterNet and as a reporter for Justmeans/3BL Media covering sustainability and corporate social responsibility. He was named one of FilterBuy’s “Top 50 Health & Environmental Journalists to Follow in 2016.” His work has been published by Truthout, Salon, BillMoyers.com, EcoWatch and Truthdig, among others.

Earth | Food | Life (EFL) explores the critical and often interconnected issues facing the climate/environment, food/agriculture and nature/animal rights, and champions action; specifically, how responsible citizens, voters and consumers can help put society on an ethical path of sustainability that respects the rights of all species who call this planet home. EFL emphasizes the idea that everything is connected, so every decision matters.

Click here to support the work of EFL and the Independent Media Institute.

Questions, comments, suggestions, submissions? Contact EFL editor Reynard Loki at [email protected]. Follow EFL on Twitter @EarthFoodLife.

Many New Voting Systems Debuted in 2020 Aren’t Ready for Prime Time

Put aside, for now, foreign meddling in U.S. elections, social media propaganda and partisan voter suppression. The newest emerging threat to elections in 2020 is new voting systems that have been insufficiently tested and phased in, but have been debuting in many of 2020’s presidential primaries and caucuses.

Since the Iowa Democratic Party’s presidential caucuses, there has been a string of new technology-based failures and frustrations—despite officials’ and voting system designers’ intentions. The failures share some common elements, from data connectivity issues to machinery breakdowns to poor planning—whether in party-run or government-run contests.

While some defenders of the newest systems praise efforts to counter cybersecurity threats since 2016’s Russian hacking, what is indisputable is that 2020’s opening contests have been marred by hours-long delays, malfunctioning machines and counting issues, frustrating voters, poll workers and campaigns.

The problems are wider and deeper than has been acknowledged. Unless steps are taken to understand what failed and address causes, they could recur in the fall’s even-higher-stakes elections, when voter turnout will likely be double or more than early 2020’s nominating contests.

Election officials who have prioritized cybersecurity in the post-2016 environment may have distracted from planning surrounding the more mundane, human aspects of voting. They assumed new equipment would work and voters would quickly adapt to new poll locations, early voting, new check-in procedures, new balloting and more. But new technology and processes have not always worked.

Voters don’t expect their elections to be hacked. Nor do they expect to wait for hours, see iPads with registration files go down, see costly new ballot-marking devices fail, see paper ballots clog new scanners, and not get honest explanations from officials about what is happening when results are delayed or inaccurate.

If these frustrations seem like expecting too much, the question of “how good is good enough” will resurface in November, when the stakes will be much higher than they are now.

Read more at Truthdig.

How Progressives Can Recapture Seven Deeply Held American Values

In recent years, my work at the Face to Face project and beyond has largely involved seeking to identify common good values, policy ideas, messages, narratives and a coherent worldview that have the power to engage across lines of difference. I have also been cultivating an approach to social change that starts with humility, curiosity, deep listening, and an abiding faith in people. I have been privileged to listen to folks from many walks of life, who have helped deepen my understanding of what binds us and the very real ways we disagree. It has been a journey beyond our political crisis and into the deeper spiritual crisis we face.

About one year ago, I had the good fortune of connecting with Richard Kahlenberg from the Century Foundation, and together we embarked on a journey to explore what Robert F. Kennedy’s political coalition can teach us about progressive politics in our time. Rick has done extensive work studying RFK, and together we have spent countless days exploring different approaches for unearthing the values, worldview, and priorities of a broad cross-section of Americans.

Today, we’re excited to release the fruits of that labor, a co-authored report: How Progressives Can Recapture Seven Deeply Held American Values.

This report provides a thorough examination and analysis of the ways in which RFK managed to have crosscutting appeal, in part because he championed seven values that Americans cherish. Although the world has changed a great deal since 1968, evidence from polls, and our direct experience working with leading organizations on the ground, suggests that these basic values still animate millions of Americans, and it is our shared belief that progressives need to be comfortable talking about these seven values if they want to connect with voters in 2020.

The report was covered this week by Tom Edsall in The New York Times and is featured in a piece we wrote that appeared in The Nation yesterday.

I hope you will take the time to read our report, share your thoughts and reactions, and share it with others.

The report was informed by Rick’s extensive learnings about the RFK coalition of 50 years ago and the ways in which Kennedy was able to pull together a diverse group of working-class voters, coupled with my experiences being immersed in organizing, engaging, and working with white, working-class Americans. But we were also able to strengthen this endeavor thanks to about 40 thought leaders who joined us for a series of lunch briefings to hear about what we’ve been exploring and offer their wisdom and guidance for how to connect these learnings with today’s voters.

I’d love to hear your reactions to the report and hope you will consider sharing with your friends and colleagues. Here’s a handy tweet that outlines the seven values we cite:

What Progressives Can Learn from Bobby Kennedy to Build a Working-Class Coalition

  1. Punch up, never down at workers
  2. Represent the importance of family
  3. Embrace patriotism as a progressive ideal
  4. Respect Americans’ religious faith
  5. Underline the dignity of work
  6. Offer a moral vision beyond material benefits
  7. Emphasize the importance of rule of law

Check out the report here.

Best,

Simon Greer
Writing Fellow
Face to Face Project

Voting Booth’s Reporting From Iowa Explains Likely Causes of Caucus Meltdown

Voting Booth’s coverage of the Iowa Democratic Party’s presidential caucus began in 2019 with delving into its plans to use telephone keypad voting for remote voters. After the DNC Rules Committee rejected that idea as unreliable and a security risk, we tracked the rest of their system’s novel features: an app to report from caucuses and their paper trail for recounts.

Our first story before the caucuses looked at what would happen next if the app failed in Iowa (and Nevada, where it was also to be used).

After the IDP delayed releasing Iowa’s results because of “partial data” and “inconsistencies” in analyses, we were first to explain what that description could mean (where clashing figures could come from) and noted there was a paper backup plan. (No other U.S. reporter attended the IDP app demo on Friday.)

Two days after the caucus, we found the IDP operations center and found a trove of training materials, scripts, app FAQs and other details, which we asked voting technology experts to assess for their inadequacies. That report not only noted what the IDP failed to anticipate but also offered lessons for Nevada’s upcoming 2020 caucuses.

Up next is an analysis separating post-Iowa facts from fiction (and conspiracy theories).